The award in Alex Genin and others rendered on June 25, 2001 in the case of Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc., and A.S. Baltoil against the Republic of Estonia dismissed a claim brought by Mr. Genin, a national of the United States, and two companies owned by him. The case was brought under the […]
Two oil traders have been awarded more than US$45 million each in damages from the Republic of Georgia in an ICSID award that advances a broad interpretation of the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard. Ioannis Kardassopoulos v Republic of Georgia, ICSID Arbitration, (No. ARB:05:18, No ARB:07:15) Award dated 3 March 2010
In OKO Pankki, three banks brought claims arising out of Estonia’a default on loan agreements which had been made to a joint venture Estonian company. In bringing their claims, the claimants asserted violations of the standard of fair and equitable treatment under the Estonia-Germnay BIT and the Estonia-Finland BIT.online pharmacy https://kendrickfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/diflucan.html no prescription drugstore The tribunal […]
In 2001, at the request of Estonia, United Utilities (Tallinn) BV made an investment in AS Tallinna Vesi by purchasing 50.4% of the shares in the Company.online pharmacy https://www.childhealthonline.org/scripts/js/desyrel.html no prescription drugstore This was a part of Estonia’s privatisation of AS Tallinna Vesi. The privatisation was sponsored and closely supervised by the European Bank for […]
On November 30, 2012, prior to the constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal, the ICSID Secretariat received a letter from the Claimant, requesting the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44. Respondent consented. The Secretary-General issued the order on discontinuance of the proceeding.online pharmacy https://www.3-dmed.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/jpg/ventolin.html no prescription drugstore Bidzina Ivanishvili v Republic of […]
The proceeding was concluded and the award was rendered on August 18, 2014. The award is not publicly available. More information can be found here.
AIG Capital Partners arises out of a Request for Arbitration by AIG Capital Partners Inc and CJSC Tema Real Estate Company requesting for arbitration of an “investment dispute” with the Republic of Kazakhstan. The claim in the Request for Arbitration arises out of the alleged expropriation of the Claimants‟ investment in a Real Estate Development […]
Parties agreed to settle the case and proceeding was discontinued at their request.online pharmacy https://www.arborvita.com/wp-content/themes/spacious/inc/new/amoxicillin.html no prescription drugstore Order taking note of the discontinuance was issued by the Tribunal on June 1, 2006 pursuant to Arbitration Rule 43(1). Western NIS Enterprise Fund v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:04:2), Order dated 16 March 2006
In 2000, Metal-Tech, an Israeli public company manufacturing molybdenum products, formed a joint venture with two state-owned companies in Uzbekistan to build and operate a plant for the production of molybdenum products.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/albuterol.html no prescription drugstore Metal-Tech was to contribute its technology, know-how, and access to international markets, as well as part of the […]
In Caratube v. Kazakhstan, the ad hoc ICSID annulment committee (the “Committee”) dismissed Caratube International Oil Company LLP’s (“CIOC”) application for annulment, finding that the ICSID tribunal (the “Tribunal”) did not (i) manifestly exceed its powers; (ii) seriously depart from a fundamental rule of procedure; or (iii) fail to state the reasons on which it based its decision, […]
İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/24 – Decision on Claimant’s Proposal to Disqualify Professor Philippe Sands- 11 July
Muhammet Çap & Sehil Inşaat Endustri ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti. v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/6 – Decision on Respondent’s Objection to Jurisdiction under Article VII(2) – 13 February 2015
Liman Caspian Oil BV and NCL Dutch Investment BV v Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/14, Award dated 22 June 2010 (excerpts)
Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GmbH and Others v. Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:08:8), Award dated 1 March 2012
Mr Franck Charles Arif v Republic of Moldova, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:11:23), Award dated 8 April 2013
Tokios Tokeles v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:02:18), 29 June 2004
Sistem Muhendislik Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v Kyrgyz Republic, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB(AF):06:1), 24 August 2009
Rumeli Telekom A.S.and Telsim Mobil Telekomikasyon Hizmetleri A.S. v Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:05:16), Award dated 17 July 2008
Bosh International, Inc and B&P Ltd. Foreign Investment Enterprise v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:08:11), Award dated 22 October 2010
Azpetrol companies vs. Republic of Azerbaijan, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/15, 02.09.2009
GEAGroup Aktiengesellschaft v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:08:16), Award dated 28 March 2011
Generation Ukraine, INC. v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:00:9), Award dated 15 September 2003
Global Trading Resource Corp. and Globex International, Inc. v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:09:11), Award dated 23 November 2010
Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GMBH and others v Ukraine, ISCID Arbitration (No. ARB:08:8), Decision on Jurisdiction dated 8 March 2010
Alpha Projektholding GMBH v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:07:16), Award dated 20 October 2010
Connect
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.