The Svea Court of Appeal, on June 17th 2020, handed down its decision in the Republic of Kazakhstan v Stati et al annulling orders of attachment against assets of the National Bank of Kazakhstan. The court ruling is the latest development in the protracted process of enforcement of an SCC investor-state award granted against Kazakhstan […]
On 2 October 2017, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to recognise and enforce an arbitration award issued in favour of Italian manufacturer SPIG by a tribunal under the Rules of the Arbitration Institution of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (the “SCC“) against indirectly state-owned Russian company Promkontroller. This decision marks the end […]
В Минске во второй раз состоялся Форум по разрешению споров в странах Восточной Европы (EEDRF). Международный формат мероприятия на несколько дней объединил юристов 20 стран мира для обсуждения ключевых тем, касающихся рассмотрения споров в международном коммерческом арбитраже и государственных судах, под слоганом «Докажи это, если сможешь». Более 200 участников и гостей, в том числе юристы […]
Накануне Форума EEDRF-2017 в Минске состоятся два бесплатных мероприятия-сателлита, которые в первую очередь ориентированы на тех специалистов, которые интересуются вопросами арбитража. 21 сентября 2017 г. организационный партнер Форума по разрешению споров в странах Восточной Европы (EEDRF) адвокатское бюро «Сысуев, Бондарь, Храпуцкий СБХ» приглашает принять участие в двух бесплатных мероприятиях-сателлитах, которые состоятся в Minsk Marriot Hotel […]
In a recent award rendered under the Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, the Arbitration Panel held that “the wording of the contract must be complied with”, if it “does not include any exceptions”. The Panel also drew a line in determining the basis for calculation of limitation period according […]
An investor filed the emergency arbitration proceeding against Moldova.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/prednisone.html no prescription drugstore The claims arose out of the suspension of claimant’s voting rights in a Moldovan bank and the forced sale of its shares within three months allegedly ordered by Moldova’s National Bank.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/lexapro.html no prescription drugstore The emergency arbitrator stayed Moldova’s attempts […]
More often than not, foreign investors reach some success in arbitration cases against Russia. However, obtaining ultimate remuneration for their efforts usually becomes a long and evasive target, because the award either gets annulled or faces insurmountable enforcement difficulties. Many international treaties of the Russian Federation including those concluded by the USSR as its legal predecessor include a “narrow” […]
In an earlier post the CIS Arbitration Forum reported on three investment treaty claims which have been initiated this year against Ukraine in the gas sector. In one of them a UK-based energy company, JKX Oil & Gas, and its Dutch and Ukrainian subsidiaries, Poltava Gas B.V. and JV Poltava Petroleum Company, obtained the first ever emergency arbitration award against […]
Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova, SCC Case No. V091/2012 – Final Award – 16 April 2013 (became available in 2014 only) – Part 1 Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova, SCC Case No. V091/2012 – Final Award – 16 April 2013 (became available in 2014 only) – Part […]
Yara International ASA v JSC Acron, SCC Arbitration No. V (135:2006), Award dated 17 June 2008
TNK Trade Ltd. v Swonco Swedish Oil AB, SCC Arbitration (No. 078:2000), Award dated 19 March 2004
Rual Trade Ltd. v Viva Trade LLC and others, SCC Arbitration (No. F 192:2009), Award dated 21 April 2010
Rosukrenergo AG v Emfesz, SCC Arbitration No. V (183:2009), 17 March 2011
Renta 4 S.V.S.A. v Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration No. V (024:2007), Award of Prelimenary Objections dated 20 March 2009
AMTO LLC v Ukraine, SCC Arbitration (No. 08:2005), Award dated 26 March 2008
Quasar de Valores SICAN S.A. v the Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration, Award dated 20 July 2012
Petrobart Ltd. v the Kyrgyz Republic, SCC Arbitration (No. 126:2003) Award dated 29 March 2005 Petrobart Ltd. v Kyrgyz Republic, UNCITRAL Arbitration, Award dated 13 February 2003
Mincom Service Pty Ltd. v TOO Aktubinskaya Mednaya Companiya, SCC Arbitration (No. 102:2010), Award dated 20 September 2010
Mir’s Ltd. v Joint Stock Company Technopromexport, SCC Arbitration No. V (080:2009), Award dated 19 November 2010
Italia Ukraina Gas S.p.a v National Joint-Stock Company “Naftogaz of Ukraine”, SCC Arbitration No. V (007:2008), Award dated 19 October 2009
JSC Techsnabexport v Palmco Corporation, SCC Arbitration (No. 010/2006), Award dated 11 June 2007 JSC Techsnabexport v Palmco Corporation, Final Partial Award dated 22 June 2007
Gazprom v Republic of Lithuania, SCC Arbitration No. V (125:2011), Award dated 31 July 2012
Investor vs. Kazakhstan, SCC Arbitration (No. 122/2001), Award dated 2004
Globe Nuclear Services, Supply GNSS, Ltd. v AO Techsnabexport, SCC Arbitration (No. 156:2003), Award dated 11 June 2007
Mohammad Ammar Al. Bahloul v. Republic of Tajikistan, SCC ArtliIralion No V (060II200l), Award dated 8 June 2010
Connect
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.