Public International Law

Basel Winter Arbitration School invites applications
By 6 October, 2021 0 Comments Read More →

Basel Winter Arbitration School invites applications

The Basel Winter Arbitration School will take place on 6-11 February 2022 at the Law Faculty of the University of Basel, Switzerland’s oldest university. CIS Arbitration Forum is the event’s media partner.online pharmacy https://www.3-dmed.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/jpg/levaquin.html no prescription drugstore The school will feature prominent arbitration practitioners and academics covering different types of public, private and hybrid arbitration topics, and will […]

Posted in: Events, Public International Law
Applicability of the Estoppel Principle by Ukrainian Courts
By 15 October, 2020 0 Comments Read More →

Applicability of the Estoppel Principle by Ukrainian Courts

In 2020 Ukrainian civil and commercial courts, especially the Supreme Court considerably increased invoking and applying the principle of estoppel to protect legitimate expectations and prevent procedural abuse. This is remarkable because Ukrainian law does not expressly regulate this principle. Estoppel is a legal concept that prevents someone from arguing something or asserting a right […]

Posted in: Domestic Proceedings, Public International Law
Empirical data on ISDS in the CIS: who are the main winners and losers?
By 3 September, 2020 0 Comments Read More →

Empirical data on ISDS in the CIS: who are the main winners and losers?

The CIS Arbitration Forum conducted an empirical study on the performance of States in the CIS region in known investor-state disputes between 1996 and June 2020. It shows the growth patterns of the disputes, highlights notable features of their outcomes, and identifies trends regarding the State of investor origin and nationality of arbitrators. The research […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
Dual national fails in a multi billion claim against Russia
By 31 July, 2020 0 Comments Read More →

Dual national fails in a multi billion claim against Russia

On 22 June 2020 the Russian Ministry of Justice announced that the UNCITRAL tribunal hearing Mr Serghei Pugachev’s US$14.5 billion claim against the Russian Federation under France-USSR 1989 BIT (the “BIT”) lacked jurisdiction over the claimant’s claim. The tribunal found that the claimant was not a French national at the time he made his investments […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
Глоссарий терминов и понятий системы урегулирования споров между инвесторами и государствами (русский язык)
By 4 December, 2019 0 Comments Read More →

Глоссарий терминов и понятий системы урегулирования споров между инвесторами и государствами (русский язык)

В рамках Академического форума по урегулированию споров между инвесторами и государствами подготовлен Глоссарий терминов и понятий системы урегулирования споров между инвесторами и государствами на русском языке. Составители – Максим Усынин из Университета Копенгагена и Ярослав Кривой из Британского института международного и сравнительного права. Глоссарий подготовлен с целью оказания помощи процессу Рабочей группы III ЮНСИТРАЛ (Реформа […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library, Public International Law
New Event in Minsk: Representing Interests of States in International Courts and Tribunals
By 16 September, 2019 0 Comments Read More →

New Event in Minsk: Representing Interests of States in International Courts and Tribunals

This joint event of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law and the Belarusian State University will focus on complexities of representing the interests of states in international proceedings, with a particular focus on investor-State disputes. Topics: What makes representing interests of States different compared to representing commercial entities? What are the challenges of […]

Posted in: Events, Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
CIS Regional Conventions on Cross-Border Litigation and Its Application by Russian Courts
By 9 December, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

CIS Regional Conventions on Cross-Border Litigation and Its Application by Russian Courts

Recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Russia generally require the existence of a treaty between the issuing state and the recognising state; otherwise, the principle of reciprocity applies. On the CIS level this procedure is relatively facilitated by a number of conventions. This post looks at the main features of these CIS regional […]

Posted in: Domestic Proceedings, Public International Law
Russia fights Ukraine over “Yanukovych debt”
By 9 September, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

Russia fights Ukraine over “Yanukovych debt”

The slowly developing Russia-Ukraine $3 billion sovereign debt dispute got a sudden new development when, at the end of July 2016, Russia requested the London High Court make an expedited ruling on the dispute. Following that, on 8 September 2016, the High Court scheduled the hearings for the dispute for 17-20 January 2017. The debt The history of this […]

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Public International Law
Recent Investment Arbitration Cases involving CIS States
By 12 July, 2016 1 Comments Read More →

Recent Investment Arbitration Cases involving CIS States

While the spotlight of the CIS arbitration community is currently focused on investment disputes between Ukrainian claimants and the Russian Federation, moving to jurisdictional phase in mid-July 2016, other CIS states have also provided some noteworthy developments. This post highlights general trends identified in CIS-related Investor-State Dispute Settlement (“ISDS“) since 2015, and addresses certain cases that […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
ICSID Rejects Denial of Justice Claims against Kazakhstan in a Recently Released Award
By 28 May, 2013 0 Comments Read More →

ICSID Rejects Denial of Justice Claims against Kazakhstan in a Recently Released Award

Last week ICSID released a redacted version of a 2010 award in Liman Caspian Oil B.V. and NCL Dutch Investment B.V. v. Kazakhstan.  While both the facts of the case and the parties’ positions have been redacted, the remaining parts of the award provide illuminating analysis of such issues as legality of the investment as a […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
ICSID Tribunal Found Unfair Treatment of a German Investor by Ukraine
By 20 May, 2013 0 Comments Read More →

ICSID Tribunal Found Unfair Treatment of a German Investor by Ukraine

In an earlier post CIS Arbitration Forum reported that Ukraine was ordered to pay in the region of EUR 3 million to German investors in Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GmbH and others v Ukraine. At that time the final award dated 1 March 2012 had not been published yet.online pharmacy https://kendrickfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/amoxil.html no prescription drugstore However, recently the […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
Umbrella Clause Fails to Protect US Investor in Ukraine
By 8 November, 2012 1 Comments Read More →

Umbrella Clause Fails to Protect US Investor in Ukraine

On 25 October 2012 an ICSID Tribunal unanimously dismissed all claims submitted by a US company Bosh International and its subsidiary (“Bosh”) against Ukraine. The claims arose out of the termination of a joint activities agreement (“JVA”) between a subsidiary of the claimant and Taras Shevchenko National University (the “University”) with respect to a conference […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
Caratube v. Kazakhstan Contributes to the Definition of Investment Debate
By 16 October, 2012 0 Comments Read More →

Caratube v. Kazakhstan Contributes to the Definition of Investment Debate

We reported earlier that in June 2012 an ICSID tribunal dismissed Caratube International’s USD 1 billion claim against Kazakhstan on jurisdictional grounds. The full text of the award has now been released and is discussed in this article. The dispute centred around the termination of Caratube’s licence to an oilfield in Kazakhstan and allegations that Caratube […]

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
“Remington Worldwide Limited v Ukraine” Saga: The First ECT Arbitration Conducted in Russian
By 19 August, 2012 0 Comments Read More →

“Remington Worldwide Limited v Ukraine” Saga: The First ECT Arbitration Conducted in Russian

 Remington Worldwide Limited v Ukraine is interesting not only as the first arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty (the “ECT”) conducted in Russian.  It also reasserts the importance of a fundamental aspect of the rule of law – the principle of legal certainty. The case demonstrates how far-reaching the effects of the application of the exceptions from […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
ICSID Tribunal: Kyrgyzstan Judiciary’s Decisions Amounted to Expropriation
By 23 July, 2012 1 Comments Read More →

ICSID Tribunal: Kyrgyzstan Judiciary’s Decisions Amounted to Expropriation

The importance of an ICSID award rendered in a case which involved Kyrgyzstan goes beyond the facts of the case and covered topics such as the corruption of state officials, expropriation through judicial action and calculation of the value of expropriated property in the absence of comparable transactions in Central Asia. In 2005 the Kyrgyz […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
Heavy Blow to the Turkish Investors’ Claims Against Turkmenistan
By 30 May, 2012 1 Comments Read More →

Heavy Blow to the Turkish Investors’ Claims Against Turkmenistan

In a decision released by the ICSID on May 25, 2012 the Tribunal found that the Turkey-Turkmenistan BIT required submission of the dispute in question to the national courts before the initiation of international arbitration proceedings. The tribunal however specifically noted that it is yet to decide on the effect of non-compliance with this condition. […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
Paushok et al. v. Mongolia: Windfall Profit Tax and Immigration Requirements Compatible with FET Standard
By 14 May, 2011 0 Comments Read More →

Paushok et al. v. Mongolia: Windfall Profit Tax and Immigration Requirements Compatible with FET Standard

In a recently published award a tribunal found that the windfall profit tax introduced by Mongolia as well as introduction of a penalty for exceeding the limit on employment of foreign nationals were compatible with the FET standard established by the Mongolia-Russia BIT. On the other hand, the tribunal found that the conduct of Mongolian […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
Arbitration as a Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Interstate Conflicts
By 14 March, 2011 0 Comments Read More →

Arbitration as a Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Interstate Conflicts

The International Court of Justice is currently considering the first ever case in which Russia is a party. The dispute was initiated by Georgia which alleged violations of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Georgia argues that, since 1990 Russia directly and through its controlled entities of Abkhazia and […]

Posted in: Public International Law
The European Court of Human Rights: an Arbitration Award Can Be Expropriated
By 9 December, 2010 0 Comments Read More →

The European Court of Human Rights: an Arbitration Award Can Be Expropriated

The European Court of Human Rights recently ruled in Kin-Stib & Majkic v. Serbia that failure to enforce an arbitral award amounts to violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment of possession. This note first summarizes the ruling and then considers its implications. In particular, it discusses whether an arbitral award can be expropriated by […]

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law
The Yukos Legal Insurgency
By 7 December, 2010 1 Comments Read More →

The Yukos Legal Insurgency

When former Yukos shareholders promised a “life-long litigation” for their assets, very few took it seriously. After all, until recently there have been no precedents of successful enforcement of arbitration awards against the Russian Federation. But this perception has been changing over the last last few months, with Yukos shareholders advancing on at least three […]

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Proceedings, Investor-State Arbitration, Public International Law