Brexit & international arbitration
Yarik Kryvoi. British Institute of International and Comparative Law. Brexit & international arbitration.
Library
Mediation at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Mediation at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry Presentation by Dmitry Davydenko. The Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry comprises a Panel of mediators established in 2006 and actively involved in settlement of commercial disputes, both international and domestic.
Practice review of Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation
Обзор практики Морской арбитражной комиссии при ТПП РФ по разрешению споров из договоров страхования (2015 – 2016 гг.). Автор: Дарья Ждан-Пушкина. Статья опубликована в журнале “Страховое право” № 3, 2017. Practice review of Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry: disputes arising from insurance contracts (2015-2016).online pharmacy https://kendrickfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/symbicort.html no prescription drugstore Authored […]
International arbitration in Russia under the new legislative framework – PowerPoint presentation
International arbitration in Russia under the new legislative framework Presentation by Dmitry Davydenko at CIS-Roundtable hosted by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law (Hamburg, 5 October 2017). CIS-Roundtable is a regular discussion forum on the legal, political and societal developments of the post-Soviet region.
Bulletin of the Federal Institute of Mediation
Online journal “Bulletin of the Federal Institute of Mediation” has been published since 2017. The founder is the Russian federal state budgetary institution “The Federal Institute of Mediation”. Its goal is to set high standards of research in the field of mediation in Russia, present works of contemporary Russian and foreign academic scholars in the field […]
Судьбы международного частного права и международного коммерческого арбитража в СССР и РФ
А.И. Муранов. Повороты судеб международного частного права и международного коммерческого арбитража в СССР и РФ через призму изменений Номенклатуры специальностей научных работников и паспортов научных специальностей. Alexander I. Muranov. The twists of fate of private international law and international commercial arbitration in USSR and Russia through the lens of changes in the nomenclature of academics’ specialties and passports of academic […]
Recognition of foreign judgments without enforcement in Russia
Alexander A. Kostin, Victoria V. Kholodova. Certain issues relating to recognition of foreign judgments on economic disputes, which do not require enforcement under Arbitrazh [Commercial] Procedure Code of Russian Federation. Summary of the Article published in Journal of Russian Law, N 5, 2017.
Сборник in memoriam В.А. Кабатова и С.Н. Лебедева
Представляем электронную версию сборника памяти В.А. Кабатова и С.Н. Лебедева, ушедших в 2016 году. Collection of texts in memoriam of Sergei Lebedev and Vitaliy Kabatov. Segrei Lebedev Department of Civil and Private International Law of MGIMO at the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry; International […]
Рецензия на первый российский учебник по медиации
Представляем рецензию на учебник «Медиация» под ред. А. Д. Карпенко, А. Д. Осиновского. СПб.: Редакция журнала «Третейский суд»; М.: Статут, 2016. Рецензия подготовлена А.А. Чирикал, профессиональным медиатором, юристом, председателем комиссии по применению процедуры медиации на финансововм рынке РФ Ассоциации «Гильдия финансовых аналитиков и риск-менеджеров». Review of first Russian scholarly textbook on mediation written by a group of co-authors […]
Проект проф.стандарта «Специалист по администрированию арбитража” / Draft professional standard “Specialist in administration of arbitration”
See English text below Представляем для обсуждения проект профессионального стандарта «Специалист по администрированию арбитража (третейского разбирательства)». Данный стандарт разработан в соответствии с новым законодательством России об арбитраже, которое предусматривает понятие «администрирование арбитража». Проект подготовлен Торгово-промышленной палатой России в рамках деятельности Совета по профессиональным квалификациям ТПП РФ, созданного решением Национального совета при Президенте Российской Федерации по профессиональным […]
Вышел новый выпуск «Вестника международного коммерческого арбитража»
Выпуск (2 (13) июль – декабрь 2016) продолжает знакомить читателей с глубоким и обстоятельным анализом событий, тенденций и нюансов современной практики МКА в России и зарубежных странах, освещать разнообразные сложные и острые вопросы, связанные с МКА. CIS Arbitration Forum является партнером «Вестника международного коммерческого арбитража». International Commercial Arbitration Review Issue No. 2 for 2016: see […]
Agreement on Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Community
The Agreement was signed in Moscow in 2008 and is in force as between the following CIS states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russian Federation. Below is the text in Russian. Agreement on Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Community_Russian Source: Investment Policy Hub
Free Trade Agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union and Vietnam
Free Trade Agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union and its member states, on the one part, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, of the other part, was signed in Kazakhstan in 2015 and entered into force on 5 October 2016.online pharmacy https://salterlewismd.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/amoxil.html no prescription drugstore Chapter 8 focuses on investment protection.online pharmacy https://salterlewismd.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/fluoxetine.html no prescription drugstore […]
Kiev Convention on Settling Disputes Related to Commercial Activities
Kiev Convention on Settling Disputes Related to Commercial Activities was signed in 1992 and is in force as between the following states: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan.online pharmacy https://www.dino-dds.com/wp-content/themes/twentyseventeen/inc/new/bactroban.html no prescription drugstore It sets out rules for jurisdiction of member states’ courts in transnational disputes and legal cooperation between […]
Moscow Convention on Protection of the Rights of the Investor
Moscow Convention on Protection of the Rights of the Investor was signed on 28 March 1997 and is in force as between the following CIS member states: Armenia, Belarus, The Republic of Moldova, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.online pharmacy https://kendrickfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/finasteride.html no prescription drugstore The Convention provides main types of obligations of host states towards foreign investors, […]
Minsk Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters
Minsk Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters was signed in 1993 and is in force as between the following states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan.online pharmacy https://www.dino-dds.com/wp-content/themes/twentyseventeen/inc/new/trazodone.html no prescription drugstore The Convention provides the rules for legal cooperation between member states’ courts […]
Казус самопоручительства и проблема необоснованного “умножения сущностей” должника
Микшис Д.В. Казус самопоручительства и проблема необоснованного умножения сущностей должника. 2017. Публикация подготовлена на основе более ранней статьи, впервые опубликованной в издании: Академический вестник ТГАМЭУП № 4(30) – серия «Право» [Текст]: научно-аналитический журнал. Тюмень: «Тюменская государственная академия мировой экономики, управления и права» («ТГАМЭУП»), 2014. С. 112 – 123. Переработана и дополнена. В данной редакции публикуется впервые. Denis Mikshis. The case of self-suretyship […]
Третейский суд как институт частного права: новый этап дискуссии
2017_Микшис Д.В. Третейский суд как институт частного права. Статья является расширенной версией статьи опубликованной в 2015 году: Микшис Д. В. Третейский суд как институт частного права: историография вопроса и новый этап дискуссии / Пятый Пермский конгресс ученых-юристов (г. Пермь, 24−25 октября 2014 г. ): Избранные материалы / Отв. ред. В. Г. Голубцов, О. А. Кузнецова […]
V международный студенческий конкурс ICC Lex Mercatoria завершился в Минске
В пятый раз благодаря организаторам V Международного студенческого конкурса по международному торговому праву и международному коммерческому арбитражу ICC Lex Mercatoria в Минске на юридическом факультете БГУ собрались студенческие команды юридических факультетов различных стран для участия в учебном соревновании высокого профессионального уровня. По традиции предварял студенческий конкурс одноименный юридический форум.online pharmacy http://www.handrehab.us/flash/swf/albuterol.html no prescription drugstore Темой […]
Интервью с Генеральным секретарем Венского международного арбитражного центра
Интервью с д-ром Манфредом Хайдером (Dr.online pharmacy http://www.handrehab.us/flash/swf/doxycycline.html no prescription drugstore Manfred Heider), Генеральным секретарем Венского международного арбитражного центра при Федеральной палате экономики Австрии (VIAC) (февраль 2016 г.online pharmacy http://www.handrehab.us/flash/swf/amoxicillin.html no prescription drugstore ) DRJV-Interview (ru) with Dr. Manfred Heider, VIAC, Feb 2016
TSIKinvest LLC v. Republic of Moldova
An investor filed the emergency arbitration proceeding against Moldova.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/prednisone.html no prescription drugstore The claims arose out of the suspension of claimant’s voting rights in a Moldovan bank and the forced sale of its shares within three months allegedly ordered by Moldova’s National Bank.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/lexapro.html no prescription drugstore The emergency arbitrator stayed Moldova’s attempts […]
Energoalians TOB v. Republic of Moldova
In Energoalians TOB v. Republic of Moldova, an investor brought claims arising out of the non-payment of accumulated debt by the State-owned entity Moldtranselectro and by another former partner of Energoalians, for energy supplied in 1999-2000.online pharmacy https://www.mydentalplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/new/zoloft.html no prescription drugstore The arbitration proceeded under the UNCITRAL Arbitration rules. The Tribunal decided in favour of the investor and […]
State Enterprise “Energorynok v. Republic of Moldova
Energorynok, a state-owned energy company, brought an arbitration claim against the Republic of Moldova seeking to recover a debt of USD 1.7 million from an economic agent affiliated to Moldova’s Energy Ministry. The Tribunal found confusing and inconsistent the Claimant’s arguments on quantum and rejected the claim as groundless. The award was rendered on 29 January 2015 and is available […]
Iurii Bogdanov, Agurdino-Invest Ltd. and Agurdino-Chimia JSC v. Republic of Moldova
An investor filed the SCC arbitration claim alleging indirect expropriation after the Moldova’s Customs Department supposedly restricted the operations of claimant’s paint-manufacturing company in a so-called free economic zone.online pharmacy http://miamihealth.com/images/jpg/antabuse.html no prescription drugstore The tribunal rendered the decision on 31 January 2006 in favour of the State.online pharmacy http://miamihealth.com/images/jpg/amoxicillin.html no prescription drugstore The award is available […]
Kompozit LLC v Republic of Moldova (SCC Emergency Arbitration)
In June 2016 Kompozit LLC, a Russian shareholder of JSC Moldova Agroindbank (MAIB) applied for interim relief from SCC Emergency Arbitrator Mr. José Rosell. The dispute arose out of the actions by the National Bank of Moldova impairing the Claimant’s shareholding in MAIB: finding that Claimant failed to receive its approval of obtaining substantive shareholding, subsequent suspension of its shareholding […]
Evrobalt LLC v. Republic of Moldova (SCC Emergency Arbitration)
In May 2016 Evrobalt LLC, a Russian shareholder of JSC Moldova Agroindbank (MAIB) applied for interim relief from SCC Emergency Arbitrator Mr.online pharmacy https://petalk.com/image/jpeg/antabuse.html no prescription drugstore Georgios Petrochilos. The dispute arose out of the actions by the National Bank of Moldova impairing the Claimant’s shareholding in MAIB: finding that Claimant failed to receive its approval of obtaining […]
İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan
This arbitration concerns a dispute between İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi, a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Turkey, and Turkmenistan. The dispute was submitted by the Claimant to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) on the basis of the Agreement between the Republic of Turkey and Turkmenistan concerning the Reciprocal Promotion […]
Международное частное право и международный коммерческий арбитраж как приложения в юридической реальности
“Международное частное право и международный коммерческий арбитраж как приложения в юридической реальности”: видеозапись лекции Александра Муранова, управляющего партнера Коллегии адвокатов «Муранов, Черняков и партнеры» на Юридическом факультете МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова.
Remington Worldwide Limited (UK) v. Ukraine
The Gibraltar registered company Remington Worldwide Limited (“Remington”) filed a request for arbitration with the SCC on 22 September 2008. According to information communicated by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, the company accused Ukraine of violating several provisions of Article 10 of the ECT, and, in particular, of failure to provide effective means for the assertion of claims and enforcement of […]
Alex Genin and Others v. Republic of Estonia
The award in Alex Genin and others rendered on June 25, 2001 in the case of Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc., and A.S. Baltoil against the Republic of Estonia dismissed a claim brought by Mr. Genin, a national of the United States, and two companies owned by him. The case was brought under the […]
Ioannis Kardassopoulos and Ron Fuchs v. Republic of Georgia
Two oil traders have been awarded more than US$45 million each in damages from the Republic of Georgia in an ICSID award that advances a broad interpretation of the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard. Ioannis Kardassopoulos v Republic of Georgia, ICSID Arbitration, (No. ARB:05:18, No ARB:07:15) Award dated 3 March 2010
Oko Pankki v. Republic of Estonia
In OKO Pankki, three banks brought claims arising out of Estonia’a default on loan agreements which had been made to a joint venture Estonian company. In bringing their claims, the claimants asserted violations of the standard of fair and equitable treatment under the Estonia-Germnay BIT and the Estonia-Finland BIT.online pharmacy https://kendrickfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/diflucan.html no prescription drugstore The tribunal […]
United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia
In 2001, at the request of Estonia, United Utilities (Tallinn) BV made an investment in AS Tallinna Vesi by purchasing 50.4% of the shares in the Company.online pharmacy https://www.childhealthonline.org/scripts/js/desyrel.html no prescription drugstore This was a part of Estonia’s privatisation of AS Tallinna Vesi. The privatisation was sponsored and closely supervised by the European Bank for […]
Bidzina Ivanishvili v. Republic of Georgia
On November 30, 2012, prior to the constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal, the ICSID Secretariat received a letter from the Claimant, requesting the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44. Respondent consented. The Secretary-General issued the order on discontinuance of the proceeding.online pharmacy https://www.3-dmed.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/jpg/ventolin.html no prescription drugstore Bidzina Ivanishvili v Republic of […]
Türkiye Petrolleri Anonim Ortaklığı v. Republic of Kazakhstan
The proceeding was concluded and the award was rendered on August 18, 2014. The award is not publicly available. More information can be found here.
AIG Capital Partners, Inc. and CJSC Tema Real Estate Company v. Republic of Kazakhstan
AIG Capital Partners arises out of a Request for Arbitration by AIG Capital Partners Inc and CJSC Tema Real Estate Company requesting for arbitration of an “investment dispute” with the Republic of Kazakhstan. The claim in the Request for Arbitration arises out of the alleged expropriation of the Claimants‟ investment in a Real Estate Development […]
Anatolie Stati and Others v. Republic of Kazakhstan
In Anatolie Stati and others, a Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Tribunal found that, through a “string of measures of coordinated harassment” of Claimants’ investments related to the Borankol and Tolkyn Fields and Munaibay Oil, to the Contract 302 Properties, and to the LPG Plant,” Kazakhstan violated the Fair and Equitable Treatment provision of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). As a […]
Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation
Respondent filed the motion to dismiss petition to confirm arbitration awards for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the U.S. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”).online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/desyrel.html no prescription drugstore The motion was granted by the United States District Court, District of Columbia. Hulley Enterprises Limited v Russian Federation, PCA Arbitration (No. AA 226), Award dated […]
Western NIS Enterprise Fund v. Ukraine
Parties agreed to settle the case and proceeding was discontinued at their request.online pharmacy https://www.arborvita.com/wp-content/themes/spacious/inc/new/amoxicillin.html no prescription drugstore Order taking note of the discontinuance was issued by the Tribunal on June 1, 2006 pursuant to Arbitration Rule 43(1). Western NIS Enterprise Fund v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:04:2), Order dated 16 March 2006
Metal-Tech Ltd. v. Republic of Uzbekistan
In 2000, Metal-Tech, an Israeli public company manufacturing molybdenum products, formed a joint venture with two state-owned companies in Uzbekistan to build and operate a plant for the production of molybdenum products.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/albuterol.html no prescription drugstore Metal-Tech was to contribute its technology, know-how, and access to international markets, as well as part of the […]
Connect
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.