TNK Trade v. Swonko Swedish Oil
TNK Trade Ltd. v Swonco Swedish Oil AB, SCC Arbitration (No. 078:2000), Award dated 19 March 2004
Author Archive: Dmitry Davydenko
Dr Davydenko directs and co-edis the CIS Arbitration Forum. He is a lawyer with 20+ years experience in Russian and transnational law. He teaches law at Belarusian State University, Department of International law, MGIMO (Tashkent), and other law schools in France, Russia and other jurisdictions.
Dmitry Davydenko has experience as an arbitrator in the ICC and other arbitral proceedings and is listed as a recommended arbitrator of DIAC, HKIAC, TIAC as well as of other reputed arbitral institutions.
Included in the list of best practitioners in arbitration in Russia as of the years 2017 through 2021 (a Global leader for 2022) by Who’s Who Legal and Global Arbitration Review (GAR).
He also acts as a Russian law expert on various matters related to international commerce.
The Boeing Company Mfl v. Korolev Rocket
Boeing companies v Open Joint-Stock Company S.P. Korolev Rocket and others, UNCITRAL Arbitration, 11 October 2010
Sistem v. Republic of Kyrgyzstan
Sistem Muhendislik Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v Kyrgyz Republic, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB(AF):06:1), 24 August 2009
Rumble Telekom v. Republic of Kazakhstan
Rumeli Telekom A.S.and Telsim Mobil Telekomikasyon Hizmetleri A.S. v Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:05:16), Award dated 17 July 2008
Rual Trade v. Viva Trade
Rual Trade Ltd. v Viva Trade LLC and others, SCC Arbitration (No. F 192:2009), Award dated 21 April 2010
Rosukrenergo AG v. Emfetz
Rosukrenergo AG v Emfesz, SCC Arbitration No. V (183:2009), 17 March 2011
Romak v. Republic of Uzbekistan
Romak S.A. v Republic of Uzbekistan, PCA Arbitration (No. AA280), 22 November 2009
Renta 4 et al v. Russian Federation
Renta 4 S.V.S.A. v Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration No. V (024:2007), Award of Prelimenary Objections dated 20 March 2009
Amto v. Ukraine
AMTO LLC v Ukraine, SCC Arbitration (No. 08:2005), Award dated 26 March 2008
Quasar de Valores SICAV S.A. et al v. Russian Federation
Quasar de Valores SICAN S.A. v the Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration, Award dated 20 July 2012
Petrobart Ltd v. Republic of Kyrgyzstan
Petrobart Ltd. v the Kyrgyz Republic, SCC Arbitration (No. 126:2003) Award dated 29 March 2005 Petrobart Ltd. v Kyrgyz Republic, UNCITRAL Arbitration, Award dated 13 February 2003
Sergei Paushok v. Republic of Mongolia
Sergei Paushok v Government of Mongolia, UNCITRAL Arbitration, Award 28 April 2011
Mincom Services v. TOO Aktobinskaya
Mincom Service Pty Ltd. v TOO Aktubinskaya Mednaya Companiya, SCC Arbitration (No. 102:2010), Award dated 20 September 2010
Mir’s Ltd. v. JSC Technopromexport
Mir’s Ltd. v Joint Stock Company Technopromexport, SCC Arbitration No. V (080:2009), Award dated 19 November 2010
Bosh International v. Ukraine
Bosh International, Inc and B&P Ltd. Foreign Investment Enterprise v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:08:11), Award dated 22 October 2010
Bogdanov and Others v. Moldova
Iurii Bogdanov, Agurdino, Invest Ltd, Agurdino–Chimia JSC v Moldova, SCC Arbitration No. V (114:2009), Award dated 22 September 2005
Link Trading v. Moldova
Link Trading Joint Stock Company vs. Republic of Moldova, UNCITRAL Arbitration, 16.02.2001 Link Trading Joint Stock Company vs. Republic of Moldova, UNCITRAL Arbitration, 18.04.2002
Azpetrol v. Azerbajan
Azpetrol companies vs. Republic of Azerbaijan, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/15, 02.09.2009
Italia-Ukraina-Gas v. Naftogaz of Ukraine
Italia Ukraina Gas S.p.a v National Joint-Stock Company “Naftogaz of Ukraine”, SCC Arbitration No. V (007:2008), Award dated 19 October 2009
Techsnab Export v. Palmco Corporation
JSC Techsnabexport v Palmco Corporation, SCC Arbitration (No. 010/2006), Award dated 11 June 2007 JSC Techsnabexport v Palmco Corporation, Final Partial Award dated 22 June 2007
Gazprom v. Republic of Lithuania
Gazprom v Republic of Lithuania, SCC Arbitration No. V (125:2011), Award dated 31 July 2012
GEA Group v. Ukraine
GEAGroup Aktiengesellschaft v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:08:16), Award dated 28 March 2011
Generation Ukraine v. Ukraine
Generation Ukraine, INC. v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:00:9), Award dated 15 September 2003
Investor (unnamed) v. Republic of Kazakhstan
Investor vs. Kazakhstan, SCC Arbitration (No. 122/2001), Award dated 2004
Global Trading v. Ukraine
Global Trading Resource Corp. and Globex International, Inc. v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:09:11), Award dated 23 November 2010
Globe Nuclear Services v. TechsnabExport
Globe Nuclear Services, Supply GNSS, Ltd. v AO Techsnabexport, SCC Arbitration (No. 156:2003), Award dated 11 June 2007
Inmaris Perestroika v. Ukraine
Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GMBH and others v Ukraine, ISCID Arbitration (No. ARB:08:8), Decision on Jurisdiction dated 8 March 2010
Alpha v. Ukraine
Alpha Projektholding GMBH v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:07:16), Award dated 20 October 2010
Al-Bahloul v. Republic of Tajikistan
Mohammad Ammar Al. Bahloul v. Republic of Tajikistan, SCC ArtliIralion No V (060II200l), Award dated 8 June 2010
DigiTelCom v. Tele 2 Sverige AB
DigiTelCom v. Tele 2 Sverige AB, ICDR Arbitration(No 50 494T0030909), Award dated 26 September 2011
Baltic Arbitration Days Will Take Place in Riga this June
Baltic Arbitration Day will take place on 13–14 June 2013 at Riga Graduate School of Law, Latvia. At this annual conference DIS Baltikum (Baltic Regional Group of German Institution of Arbitration) is the main host of the conference and CIS Arbitration Forum is its information sponsor. The main conference topic is Arbitration in Corporate and Finance […]
Russian Arbitration Day Will Take Place in June 2013
Russian Arbitration Day will take place on 20 June 2013 at the Congress Centre of the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Moscow. CIS Arbitration Forum is an information sponsor of the event. This conference is different from others for the following reasons. First, participation in the conference is free of charge. This policy is aimed at attracting delegates from […]
Conference in Moscow Will Mark 80th Anniversary of the ICAC
On 30 November 2012 the Congress Center of the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry will host an international conference “International Commercial Arbitration in Russia and Worldwide: Trends of Development and Modern Practice”. The conference is dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (the “ICAC“). CIS […]
Court of Eurasian Economic Community Renders Its First Judgment
The task to create in the former USSR an international body comparable to the Court of the European Union is challenging. But this has already started to take shape: such a body not only exists, but it has already heard and resolved its first case, which was initiated by a Russian company. The Eurasian Economic Community (“EurAsEC”) currently includes […]
International Conference “Russia as a Place for Dispute Resolution” – Moscow, December 2012
On 7 December 2012 the Russian National Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce – the World Business Organization (ICC Russia) in cooperation with the ICC International Court of Arbitration will organise an annual arbitration conference “Russia as a Place for Dispute Resolution”. CIS Arbitration Forum is the event’s information sponsor and is an information partner of […]
Experts Encouraged to Take Advantage of Russia’s Accession to the WTO
An international conference “Russia in the World Trade Organization: New Tools to Protect Business” took place at the World Trade Centre in Moscow on October 24, 2012. The conference was held by ICC Russia and law firm Muranov Chernyakov & Partners. Russia acceded to the WTO on August 22, 2012. The accession was preceded by the relevant decree of the […]
Powers of Attorney Regarding Future Disputes in Russia
The Presidium of the Russian Supreme Commercial Court has clarified its position on the authority to conclude arbitration agreements. The general counsel of a company branch concluded a contract with an arbitration agreement under a power of attorney authorising him to represent the company at court and in particular to settle disputes or to refer […]
Arbitral Tribunals Can Approve “Post-Award” Amicable Agreement
A settlement agreement can be concluded even after the arbitral tribunal has rendered an award in the case, and such an agreement can be approved by the same arbitral tribunal as a consent award. The Russian Supreme Commercial Court (the “SCC”) Presidium reached this conclusion on June 7, 2012. The circumstances of the case were as […]
New Competition on ICC Lex Mercatoria Will Launch in Belarus in November
An International Student Competition on International Trade Law and International Commercial Arbitration will take place in Minsk, Belarus on 23-26 November 2012. Students from 20 major universities of the CIS and Baltic States are invited to participate in the Competition on International Trade Law and International Commercial Arbitration – ICC Lex Mercatoria.online pharmacy https://imed.isid.org/wp-content/languages/themes/po/amoxicillin.html no […]
Seminar in October: Dispute Resolution Traditions and Realities in Russia and CIS Countries
New York – 5 October 2012 – ICDR Y&I, in cooperation with the American Bar Association’s Section of International Law, is inviting you to take part in a lively discussion at the ICDR Y&I Seminar for Young Practitioners “Dispute Resolution Traditions and Realities in Russia and CIS Countries: Some Tips for Litigation and Arbitration with CIS […]
Connect
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.